You’ve just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how “all women” act. You should get off the internet for a while.
Comment on Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard
rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 year agoWow, that’s some intense double standards there.
That’s an odd way of saying “ubiquitous female standards”.
frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 year ago
rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
You’ve just been all over this thread with your misogynistic hot takes and telling people how “all women” act. You should get off the internet for a while.
Mmm-hm. Attempts to socially shame me into silence and an ad hominem on top of that, but not a whisper of a viable rebuttal.
That’s the problem with these censure attempts – always feelings over facts, instead of facts over feelings.
frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There is nothing you’ve said worthy of rebuttal.
rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
There is nothing you’ve said worthy of rebuttal.
Ah - a sour grapes response!
Don’t worry, I know you had absolutely nothing to counter with once I saw the ad hominem. That’s the problem with intellectual bankruptcy, after all - nothing to work with except rage and other emotions. No facts, only feelings. So out come the personal attacks like the ad hominems, because rage and shame are the only usable tools left.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
There are cis women out there dating trans women who’ve likely had sex with men. So common yet, but I think ubiquitous isn’t accurate.
rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I wasn’t commenting on this particular double standard anywhere as much as double standards, in general; especially those which are almost exclusively one-way and “acceptable” for only women to hold.