It’s no accident. I was out of a job for half the year and saw this so many times. In states where the laws aren’t specific enough, posting a huge rave is how companies comply with the letter but not the spirit of it.
Comment on Companies lower salaries in job postings as pay transparency laws take effect
cm0002@lemmy.world 1 year agoI kinda want to give them the benefit of the doubt because that’s just odd it seems as if someone just fat fingered the 3, because 75-95 makes a lot more sense
But then again corporate gonna corporate soooo
Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 year ago
sxan@midwest.social 1 year ago
You’ve never shopped for housing in California, have you? $95k doesn’t give you rent for a room in a quad.
cm0002@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well I wasn’t really saying it was a fair or decent wage lol just that it made more sense for the range to be a difference of 20k instead of 320k lmao
sxan@midwest.social 11 months ago
Completely agree. I had the same logic, only since it was CA I figured they fat-finger-dropped a “2” in front of the first number.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s way too low for CA. But 395 is director-level.
bouh@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That’s very fat fingers to type a 3 next to a - or a 9.
hightrix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Unfortunately, this level of job regularly pays 200k plus or minus a bit. So I doubt it was a fat finger unless they meant 175-395.
DoomBot5@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Maybe they did fat finger it, but they didn’t care because they weren’t being paid enough?
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Minimum wage, minimum effort
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
We need to eliminate the expectation that underpaid workers will or should bust their butt for the potential of a raise.
You treat me right and pay me well (a sustainable income) then I’ll move mountains for you. But treat me inhumanely or pay me a pittance and I’ll assume you wish I wasn’t here.
LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I usually average out the two salaries and use that as their “intended” starting pay.
So (75 + 395)/2 = 235k a year avg starting salary for an average applicant.
The top end I consider the pay if the applicant meets all the requirements listed in the job ad.
hightrix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Good call. That’s exactly what I do. I haven’t applied to a job like this m, but it seems like a good enough way to estimate.