Remove the chowder from your head and actually read the article…
Comment on Sikh 'barred from Birmingham jury service' for religious sword
BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
What an idiot. He should feel ashamed for himself but instead he feels “discriminated against”.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Chariotwheel@kbin.social 1 year ago
I don't think so. Simply, because there is an actual exception for this:
I think the security guard made a mistake there.
people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Do you think Sikhs across the world all walk around with “symbolic” blades just because they’re a sign of their religion? These people only do stuff like this for clout, nothing else.
Chariotwheel@kbin.social 1 year ago
Yes, I do.
But even if it was for clout, it wouldn't change anything about it being allowed.
You can say that you don't think religions should have excemptions, but that's another topic. As of this incident the excemption exists and he should be able to carry a blade according to the restrictions in there.
people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Then you’re stupid.
The job of every guard is to look out for threats. If the guard feels it is in the interest of everyone’s safety that a participant removes a literal weapon from their person before entering a place of importance, it is completely reasonable on his behalf. That the participant is feeling sentimental about it is not the guard’s fault and neither should it be.
amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Yeah, of course what the fuck?
HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 year ago
I think where the symbolic blade has been specifically legislated into UK law, yes UK law should pertain.
Zellith@kbin.social 1 year ago
Took about 10 seconds to google.
people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Yes indeed, random Google text is more reliable than someone who literally lives in Punjab 🤦♂️