Comment on kingdom come

abbotsbury@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  They don’t, they’re a distinct third thing with a distinct third type of cells

  Image

  They are, however, more closely related to us animals than they are to plants. As in, our last common ancestor is less far back.

  Also, unrelated to your comment, but related to the post: vegetable isn’t a botanical term, but a culinary term. So, there’s no bioligical basis for vegetable in the first place, so there’s no issue with counting mushrooms among them. Sure, it’s a bit inconvenient that the word ‘fruit’ is both a culinary and a botanical term in English, and there’s overlap to it, but that doesn’t mean it’s somehow illogical that some things are culinarilu fruits but not botanically, and vice versa.

  source

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    So, there’s no bioligical basis for vegetable in the first place

    idk if I would go that far, I think “edible parts of plants” is a solid foundation. Sure, “edible” is kind of a social construct, but the plant part is indisputable. “Vegetarian” and “plant based diet” are near synonymous

    source

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Maybe non-animal is better than just plant, since mushrooms are part of plant based diets.

      source
    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I’ve never been under the impression that any edible plant part is a vegetable. Like, an almond? An apple? Rice? Cinnamon? I could go on. All edible plant parts. I’ve never heard of them be referred to as vegetables.

      source
• stray@pawb.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  What do you mean?

  source