Yea, or “the first twenty are free but the remaining five you don’t have to give are a problem”.
Comment on Anon describes experience
remi_pan@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
“Impossible” would be a more mathematically accurate answer than “zero”.
Soup@lemmy.world 2 months ago
prototact@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
It’s not a matter of accuracy even, if for any two natural numbers x < y it holds x - y = 0 then x = y, which is a contradiction. So this is basic consistency requirement, basically sabotaging any effort to teach kids math.
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Depends on how your mathematical system is defined. In the mathematics system this teacher is using, negative numbers simply do not exist. The answer to 5-6 is the same as 5/0: NaN. Is this mathematical system incomplete? Yes. But, as has been thoroughly proven, there is no such thing as a complete mathematical system.
SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The answer would still not be 0 as 0 is clearly still well defined within that system. NaN, undefined, etc. would be acceptable answers though. Otherwise you define:
for x > y, y - x = 0
Which defines that x = y
Resulting in the conditional x > y no longer being true
Also x/0 isn’t NaN. It’s just poorly defined and so in computing will often return “NaN” because what the answer is depends on the numbering system used and accidentally switching/conflating numbering systems is a very easy way to create a mathmatical fallacy like the one above.
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
you clearly haven’t read IEEE 754
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
I was under the impression that there is in fact such a thing as a complete mathematical system (if you take “mathematical system” in the broader sense of “internally consistent system”), but such a system would be pretty limited and therefore rather useless.