I disagree here, making an engine you’d sell must be top notch in every aspect (or close to), an in-house engine only needs to get the job done for your game. Probably two orders of magnitude in needed workforce, depending on your needs ofc.
Comment on Anon is a game dev
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 12 hours agoIf you have the talent and manpower to create your own engine, it’s better business to make that engine your product instead of whatever game you wanted to make.
Valmond@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Very very few actual profitable companies roll their own engines.
Supercell has their own, but it’s because they started before there was anything available.
Indie games make their own engines but it’s more of a hobby or passion project, not something that can employ two dozen people to develop it.
bussubbus@lemmy.zip 6 hours ago
It’s not really that great of a business.
Epic is estimated to have made $275M revenue on Unreal engine in 2023, vs $4.7B on Fortnite
Unity made $614M revenue on engine & tools in 2024, in ads and monetization they made $1.2B
These are stable industry standard engines, if you start work on your challenging engine today it’ll take years to develop, gain game-developers interest and trust. And still you’re competing with giants that use their engines as loss-leaders.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Then you only get a big geneal thing like Unity again.
EldenLord@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
From Software and Hideo Kojima would disagree. The highest form of passion for your game is to create an engine that gives it the exact gameplay formula you want it to have.