Are you sure? The numbers in the tweet talk about total mass and heat capacity. So I think that means the entire bulk has that average temperature.
Comment on Chickenslap
zedgeist@lemmy.world 1 day agoThat 205C would just be the surface temperature of the chicken, not the average
laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
zedgeist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
See my edit
laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
One thing’s for sure: a chicken slapped at 3726 mph won’t be very tasty. Or look too good.
zedgeist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What, you don’t like vaporized poultry?
Ledericas@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
slap
It won’t be a chicken anymore, Instant mist
lvxferre@mander.xyz 23 hours ago
Nope. Likely an American.
When cooking, people in general like to use round numbers, like “200°C”, since a difference of 5°C in oven temperature is not a big deal.
And yet they went with some oddly specific 205°C. That only makes sense if they’re used to Fahrenheit, eyeballed a round value (like 400°F), converted it into Celsius (204.4°C), and then rounded it up to discard the decimal.
I’m also going to say they’re completely clueless when it comes to cooking - 200°C is the oven temperature. The chicken itself reaches a far lower temperature, in the 70~80°C range. By the time the chicken reached 200°C, it’s already dry and close to catching fire. (The self-ignition temperature for biological stuff is typically between 200°C and 250°C.)