It doesnât know things.
Itâs a statistical model. It cannot synthesize information ir problem solve, only show you a rough average of its library if inputs graphed by proximity to your input.
Comment on AGI achieved đ¤
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world â¨3⊠â¨days⊠agoWhy doesnât the LLM know to write (and run) a program to calculate the number of characters?
I feel like Iâm missing something fundamental.
It doesnât know things.
Itâs a statistical model. It cannot synthesize information ir problem solve, only show you a rough average of its library if inputs graphed by proximity to your input.
Congrats, youâve discovered reductionism. The human brain also doesnât know things, as itâs composed of electrical synapses made of molecules that obey the laws of physics and direct oneâs mouth to make words in response to signals that come from the ears.
Not saying LLMs donât know things, but your argument as to why they donât know things has no merit.
Oh, thatâs why everything else you said seemed a bit off.
sorry, I only have a regular brain, havenât updated to the metaphysical edition :/
The LLM isnât aware of its own limitations in this regard. The specific problem of getting an LLM to know what characters a token comprises has not been the focus of training. Itâs a totally different kind of error than other hallucinations, itâs almost entirely orthogonal, but other hallucinations are much more important to solve, whereas being able to count the number of letters in a word or add numbers together is not very important, since as you point out, there are already programs that can do that.
The most convincing arguments that llms are like humans arenât that llmâs are good, but that humans are just unrefrigerated meat and personhood is a delusion.
This might well be true yeah. But thatâs still good news for AI companies who want to replace humans â barâs lower than they thought.
And why we should fight them tooth and nail, yes.
Theyâre not just replacing us, theyâre making us suck more so itâs an easy sell.
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml â¨2⊠â¨days⊠ago
You didnât get good answers so Iâll explain.
First, an LLM can easily write a program to calculate the number of
r
s. If you ask an LLM to do this, you will get the code back.But the website ChatGPT.com has no way of executing this code, even if it was generated.
The second explanation is how LLMs work. They work on the word (technically token, but think word) level. They donât see letters. The AI behind it literally can only see words. The way it generates output is it starts typing words, and then guesses what word is most likely to come next. So it literally does not know how many
r
s are in strawberry. The impressive part is how good this âguessing what word comes nextâ is at answering more complex questions.Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world â¨2⊠â¨days⊠ago
But why canât âquery the python terminalâ be trained into the LLM. It just needs some UI training.
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml â¨2⊠â¨days⊠ago
ChatGPT used to actually do this. But they removed that feature for whatever reason. Now the server that the LLM runs on doesnât isnât provide the LLM a Python terminal, so the LLM canât query it