Comment

Comment on Well whenever you notice something like *that*, a wizard did it

Did Sigmund Freud’s science? Or Philip Zimbardo’s? Or Santiago Genovés‘s? Or did they contaminate their works with their preconceived notions to get false results that they already believed in? I’ll tell you the same line that I have been saying: verify with peer review and replicable results.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Balthazar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Absolutely, but that’s not what your meme says. Peer review in this case says the manuscript should be significantly revised before publishing.

source
- Squorlple@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  There are times in which a scientist may speak on matters without peer review, such as interviews, their own blogs or other personal web channels, or even a TED Talk. The meme is about those circumstances.
  
  source
  - Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    An individual doesn’t truly understand and apply the scientific approach and method if they baselessly believe that certain phenomenon are caused by supernatural forces/entities. Ergo, the individual’s credibility in their established field is called into question since they may have applied similar illogic and pretenses to their work and understanding there.
    
    That’s not what you said elsewhere.
    
    source
    Squorlple@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Those two are not mutually exclusive nor contradictory. “Credibility” is a key word, in specific reference to information obtained from an individual through any medium. It’s possible to brand oneself as a scientist in a field and become a talking head without passing proper peer review and replicable results.
    
    source