Comment on Well whenever you notice something like *that*, a wizard did it

Balthazar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Squorlple@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Did Sigmund Freud’s science? Or Philip Zimbardo’s? Or Santiago Genovés‘s? Or did they contaminate their works with their preconceived notions to get false results that they already believed in? I’ll tell you the same line that I have been saying: verify with peer review and replicable results.

  source

  • Balthazar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Absolutely, but that’s not what your meme says. Peer review in this case says the manuscript should be significantly revised before publishing.

    source

    • Squorlple@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There are times in which a scientist may speak on matters without peer review, such as interviews, their own blogs or other personal web channels, or even a TED Talk. The meme is about those circumstances.

      source

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        An individual doesn’t truly understand and apply the scientific approach and method if they baselessly believe that certain phenomenon are caused by supernatural forces/entities. Ergo, the individual’s credibility in their established field is called into question since they may have applied similar illogic and pretenses to their work and understanding there.

        That’s not what you said elsewhere.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What?

  source