I don’t know for sure, but right now we’re in a very early version of an AGI with limitations, but it’s only available to users who pay a subscription.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 days ago
How long until AGI and we don’t need separate models for every single thing?
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 18 hours ago
mj_marathon@programming.dev 2 days ago
Potentially never
0x01@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Tool use/mcp can do an awful lot already, not everything but it’s hard to come up with stuff it just plain can’t do.
Agi is poorly defined, without a clear definition of exactly what it is there will never be a time we actually achieve it because the goalposts will move.
We all probably remember the time that the turing test was the ultimate test of an ai, but that’s pretty well cooked and it no longer matters at all.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 days ago
AGI has always had a same definition: general intelligence, when an AI can do anything a human brain could.
kevin2107@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Don’t see how that’s not the case now. Only thing missing is a universal harness, which it’ll probably be able to build itself soon, for sure humans can’t.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 days ago
A pretty long time.
Niche models are tons of fun though.
pennomi@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Nobody can tell you, and if they say they do know, they’re selling snake oil.
But when it happens, shit is going to change fast, for better or for worse.
executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
If
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 days ago
When