Oops well, my bad. There’s always next election 😂
Comment on Discussion Thread 🗳️ Saturday 3 May 2025
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 year agoAlthough my intention was clear I don’t think my vote will count. This is what the AEC says when I practice, numbering only 5 boxes. Image
And in the section on “vote saving provisions” it says:
For Senate ballot papers the requirement for a formal vote is that when voting above the line, at least the numbers 1 to 6 shall be marked in the squares on the ballot paper (see subsection 239(2)).
For voting below the line, the requirement is that at least the numbers 1 to 12 are marked in the squares printed on the ballot paper (see subsection 239(1)). However, there is a vote savings measure that can operate where only one square is marked above the line (see section 269), or where voting below the line, at least six squares have been marked 1 to 6 using consecutive numbers (see section 268A).
StudChud@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Pilk@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Quote from page 14 of the “Ballot paper formality guidelines” published by the AEC on 14 August 2023:
In other words, if you only numbered 5 boxes above the line it does still count, it just exhausts sooner.
Their practice voting tool has sensibly omitted the finer details, they always encourage people to vote “correctly”.
Regardless of you definitely won’t make the same mistake next time I’m sure.
StudChud@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Ah so I was right ah ha!
That’s all I’m taking away from this 😂
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Your faith in bureaucracy being sensible was correct…
this time.
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Thanks a lot. I am just one insignificant vote but it has bothered me disproportionately all afternoon.