Comment on Sagan, you look high.

• Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Slowing a response system clearly isn’t socially advantageous in any society where people are going to be operating any method of transportation like cars, bikes etc etc. I wouldn’t have a major opposition to it if people didn’t habitually attempt to leave the house while still high. Not to mention the consumption of it exposing others to chemicals through air pollution.

  source

  • Kuori@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    air pollution

    oh hell yes now we’re talking. so you’re in favor of banning cigarettes, campfires, candles, gas stoves, and shit why not, indoor cooking too right?

    source

    • Horse@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      gas stoves

      these also expose others to risk of death by explosion as gas stoves require gas pipes which blow up every so often, usually taking a few houses with it

      source

      • Nakoichi@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        You didn’t even include the most obvious one from San Bernardino. That one still haunts me. Luckily it happened in midday with surprisingly few casualties but a gas line blew up like a whole suburban block.

        source
    • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Indoor cooking serves a social purpose that marijuana doesn’t. We can’t just do away with it. As for the other things, they are already legal most places, if they were illegal I would most certainly oppose legalizing them and cigarettes should also be banned for the innocent people they kill through causing impaired driving and exposing innocent people to their smoke.

      source

      • Kuori@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Indoor cooking serves a social purpose

        big time yeah, but so does smoking. for that matter, so does alcohol.

        We can’t just do away with it.

        sure we could! we can just do it outside.

        ngl if all you’ve got is “well these things are legal and this one isn’t” then i’m deeply uninterested. “but it’s illegal!” okay so what? in the u.s. at least those laws were created explicitly to target and demonize black people and progressive movements. i listed the things i did bc they’re all harmful to human health in one way or another. candles put out a similar level of air pollution to smoking cigarettes inside. campfires? oh you better believe that shit is terrible for you. my point is that you’re not really being honest about the reasoning behind your beliefs. it’s okay to say “i think this should be banned because i don’t like it.” maybe nobody will agree with you! maybe they will. at least it would be truthful.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Z_Poster365@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Indoor cooking serves a social purpose that marijuana doesn’t

        So because you personally see no utility in something, nobody in society can benefit from it as they see fit. This is your reactionary boomer mind poking through

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Z_Poster365@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    you

    Image

    source

    • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because I oppose dangerous drugs that kill people?

      source

      • Z_Poster365@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        yells-at-cloud

        source
      • easily3667@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Stop your bullshit

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • easily3667@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Stop your bullshit

    source

    • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Stop being a junkie sympathizer

      source

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Calling someone out for spewing bullshit does not make you a sympathizer.

        source