Comment on Space Quarry

stevedice@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• Shareni@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I mean, space doesn’t look like anything.

  source

  • tdawg@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Then what are the lines on on my graph for huh!? Dummy

    source
  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Also true. Even truer, in fact. Still validates classic Dr. Who having trash production design.

    source

    • Zacryon@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What do you mean “Dr. Who trash production design”? I really can’t understand why you would say “Dr Who trash production design”! /s

      source
• Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Most surfaces in space look like a quarry. So that’s fair. You could also include the ones that are on fire and the ones inside of some sort of toxic cloud.

  But the exceptions are the most interesting parts. There’s a reason there’s not much entertainment out there about people stranded in deserts, mountains, and open oceans that feature not a single encounter with life.

  I’ve played Star Citizen, roaming dead space and lifeless planets gets old fast.

  source

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Is most surface area on planets/asteroids, or on stars?

    source

    • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Walkable and filmable? It would be the rocky ones.

      source
• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Tecnically, this photo is taken in space.

  source

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    All photos are

    source
• logos@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I like your point, but to be pedantic, I think in this context “space” is short for outer space.

  source