Serve? In WW3? Will just be suicide. Motherfuckers will deploy, and immediately be hit by a fucking nuke. Imagine this, 1 million troops land on a beach, and then in one instant, 1 million troops are gone immediately. The only real survivors in that war will likely be submarine crews and suited up, souped up, CBRN troops either way too deep into enemy line or way away from the front lines. Any warfare after the nukes drop will just be indicative of whatever fucking spite or malice that’s deep in humanity’s heart. I mean shit, I’ve asked my military friends about WW3 once, and they said that if the world is suffering nuclear hellfire anyways, and they’ve somehow survived? They’d immediately turn their tanks and guns towards the very leaders who sent the world into such a Holocaust.
Comment on Dig this trench to protect your landlord's ability to gouge your decendants.
eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 months ago
serious question: if you refuse to serve during a war, do they just arrest you? And wouldn’t it be better than… going to war?
Gigasser@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Aux@feddit.uk 10 months ago
They arrest you and send you to war, but without weapons.
Arbiter@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Depends on how the country decides to treat its prisoners.
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Getting shot is also a common response in some nations.
vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
Where do I sign up? Getting shot doesn’t sound half bad lately
MNByChoice@midwest.social 10 months ago
Cheaper than bringing your own gun! The government can buy in bulk.