Comment on Silent Hill f has been banned in Australia, and no one knows why
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Nanny state strikes back.
This is the future the USA would have had if ESRB wasn’t cobbled together in haste
Comment on Silent Hill f has been banned in Australia, and no one knows why
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Nanny state strikes back.
This is the future the USA would have had if ESRB wasn’t cobbled together in haste
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Government regulations are better than companies deciding what’s allowed.
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Yeah mostly I would agree with that… unfortunately in this case you get exhibit A. Australia.
HorseFD@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Good thing it wasn’t actually banned.
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
I see that. We’ll just have to see
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Barely. Probably equally bad in some cases.
An educated citizenry that actively participates in government is the best solution, but we know that’s almost impossible for multiple reasons.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I would not say equally bad, citizens are at least theoretically able to influence their government in a democratic system; you have no hope of influencing the ESRB or MPAA or CCA
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Equal “badness” in the sense of commercial/oligarchy takeover or the authoritarian nanny state. Extremes where citizen input is token at best. Russia is technically a democracy, but no regular person there has a hope of changing the government or policy with a vote.