Comment on Anon is waiting for Japan

• Zron@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Take an English class you illiterate gremlin.

  Resource intense auto correct that does not understand the information it’s stringing together should not be used to write anything academically or professionally.

  source

  • BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Learn to add together big numbers in your head

    source

    • Zron@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      And that has to do with writing essays how?

      source

      • BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        A calculator, timer or calendar can’t help me write an essay.

        Those are all tools, you’re bashing this guy for using one of them, so I’m bashing you for using a calculator. I’m pretty sure that you used one once in your life

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • uranibaba@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If you don’t want to use all the tools at your desposal, that’s your choice. If I had a tool that could help me formulate my text into the proper tempus and help me use words most suited for a academic setting, why should I not use it? Did you know that writing a paper is part of university stuides, English major or not?

    Or do you not understand how to use an LLM? Do you think that one just prompts it and use whatever it produces? That is just as stupid as entering random number into a calculator, excpect it to calculate what you wanted and then say ”caluclators are bad because it gave the wrong answer”.

    source
• dustyData@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why argue with someone who isn’t intelligent enough to write their essays without mechanical assistance?

  source

  • uranibaba@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I want a more diverse discussion about LLM and AI, not the default ”AI bad” response that is so common here. :(

    source

    • dustyData@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Then stop dismissing other people’s “argumentets”. Unfortunately, most AI proponents don’t realize that the AI use case that is being pushed by it’s makers and owners is not “a tool to assist users”, but “a tool for executives to replace humans”. Is it a dumb proposal? absolutely. It doesn’t reduce the moral responsibility of those promoting AI. They are supporting the destruction of people’s livelihoods to make the wealthiest human being in history slightly wealthier, and curse knowledge workers to poverty just like factory workers were in their time by the exact same political and economic class of soulless pricks.

      source

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If the argument want as you have laid it out, I would not dismiss it. But I cannot do that when the arguemnt is ”hammers in general are bad because I cannot use them to drive to work” or ”also your essay fucking sucks. learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you”. That second one is an actual quote.

        What you bring up is how a few people is power are using AI to increase their wealth without regards for human suffering. I agree that what they are doing is wrong. And the discussion should be about how AI affects our society, how it is used and who controls it. This does not make AI a bad tool, it makes it a tool that can used in a bad way to cause a lot of harm.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I wonder why anyone would want an “AI girlfriend” or whatever ridiculous thing tech bros are trying to shoehorn monetization into to capitalize on the pervasive disconnect in society today.

    And then, when I read a post like yours, referring to someone like that, it all suddenly makes sense. Given the choice, I’d also rather spend time with unthinking silicon than an asshole who talks to people like you do.

    source
  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Weak argument, dude

    Did you use your computers spell check, ever? Cuz you’d fall for your own smart-assery if you did

    “Why argue with someone who needs something else to write the essay for them” might be better

    source
• pyre@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math” and instead feeds me bullshit that I have to correct and then it’ll say “oh yeah totally right sorry here’s the actual answer that I wouldn’t have given if you hadn’t corrected me as the one who asked the question”

  also your essay fucking sucks. learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

  source

  • uranibaba@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math”

    From what I understand, that is how OpenAI has decided to make their LLM and not an inherit property of LLMs, but I could you be wrong.

    also your essay fucking sucks

    Did you read it?

    learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

    I’ll take a guess here. You think I had the LLM write my essey for me. You also think I used it to correct my spelling.
    I already have other software that can help me with my spelling, so that was not needed. I wrote my whole essey first, because actually doing myself is faster and gives a better result than trying to prompt an AI to do it, at least for me.

    What I did do was feed my text into an LLM to see how I could improve the structure of my text, how tense could be used correctly and if any words that I used could be changed for a better substitute. All of those are things that I could do myself, but I had an excellent tool to help me with it so I used it.

    Not using it would be just as stupid as not using a software to correct spelling becuase it might get the spelling wrong.

    I think you do not understand how to get the most out of an LLM or you are using it wrong. Or both.

    source