Comment on Dunning-Kruger

• Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  That there are men (xy) with female parts

  This is your misunderstanding right there. XY is not automatically a man. You are the one making the claim that chromosoms define if you are a man or a woman, and the PhD and the other guy are telling you that there are people born with XY who are cis women with female genitalia. You are wrong.

  I don’t think the phd is saying that though because they talk about xx becoming xy

  No, they are not. They are telling you that there are people born with XX but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women. No one told you that some XY people changed to XX. This does not happen. This is not what the PhD said, and this is not what the other guy explained to you. You are wrong.

  source

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Now you’re saying it

    No matter what conservatives like you or that doctor say

    They are telling you that there are people born with XY but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women

    what’s in your pants doesn’t determine gender

    source

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      ??? No one said it determines your gender. We’re telling you that it happens. Obviously there are XY people who grow up to be cis men, trans women, but also cis women, and surely trans men as well, or anything inbetween. You’re the only one making this all up for some reason.

      source

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Has y = man

        No y = woman

        no matter someone’s parts or how they act changes that. Stop being sexist

        source

        • -> View More Comments