Comment on Dunning-Kruger

• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That there are men (xy) with female parts, do I was correct when I said that parts don’t define gender

  So now that we’re on the same side, why are you arguing?

  source

  • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That there are men (xy) with female parts

    This is your misunderstanding right there. XY is not automatically a man. You are the one making the claim that chromosoms define if you are a man or a woman, and the PhD and the other guy are telling you that there are people born with XY who are cis women with female genitalia. You are wrong.

    I don’t think the phd is saying that though because they talk about xx becoming xy

    No, they are not. They are telling you that there are people born with XX but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women. No one told you that some XY people changed to XX. This does not happen. This is not what the PhD said, and this is not what the other guy explained to you. You are wrong.

    source

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Now you’re saying it

      No matter what conservatives like you or that doctor say

      They are telling you that there are people born with XY but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women

      what’s in your pants doesn’t determine gender

      source

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        ??? No one said it determines your gender. We’re telling you that it happens. Obviously there are XY people who grow up to be cis men, trans women, but also cis women, and surely trans men as well, or anything inbetween. You’re the only one making this all up for some reason.

        source

        • -> View More Comments