Comment on Dunning-Kruger

• Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  … And you still don’t understand it, and you assume that everyone else is wrong even after it was explained to you.

  source

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That there are men (xy) with female parts, do I was correct when I said that parts don’t define gender

    So now that we’re on the same side, why are you arguing?

    source

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      That there are men (xy) with female parts

      This is your misunderstanding right there. XY is not automatically a man. You are the one making the claim that chromosoms define if you are a man or a woman, and the PhD and the other guy are telling you that there are people born with XY who are cis women with female genitalia. You are wrong.

      I don’t think the phd is saying that though because they talk about xx becoming xy

      No, they are not. They are telling you that there are people born with XX but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women. No one told you that some XY people changed to XX. This does not happen. This is not what the PhD said, and this is not what the other guy explained to you. You are wrong.

      source

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Now you’re saying it

        No matter what conservatives like you or that doctor say

        They are telling you that there are people born with XY but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women

        what’s in your pants doesn’t determine gender

        source

        • -> View More Comments