If it does, they really need to make that more obvious! The smaller one is “ultra concentrated”, but is it more expensive per load? Is the assumption that someone who used to buy the larger bottle would even know that the smaller one is “better”?
Comment on I'm sure people fall for this type of greenwashing all the time...
nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Does it have less detergent? The company we used to use, before switching to powder, did this. But it was the same amount of detergent, less water. They updated the amount you should use per load with the change.
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Devadander@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s very clearly printed on there, 60 loads vs 74.
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
If you were using the larger bottle, would you know that the smaller one had more loads? You’d only know that it uses “less plastic” (per load, not per volume).
Devadander@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes of course, why wouldn’t you? You’re trying very hard to make this an issue but it’s really not.
Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 1 day ago
lol this thinking right here contributes to the problem. “The bigger bottle HAS to be better, right?”.
If people would stop and read to see what they’re spending their money on, we wouldn’t be buying larger quantities of mostly water-based products in favor of more concentrated versions.
earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
The math checks out too. The smaller bottle uses about 45% less volume per load