Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old)
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
No, he (an adult) is weirdly obsessed with a boy (a MINOR) 6 years younger than him. This is effing disgusting and I can’t interpret it any other way. Him wanting to be shipped (which is typically a ROMANTIC pairing) with this boy coupled with wanting to go on a double date with him (“dates” can technically be platonic but not in this context) is weird and definitely romantic.
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
[deleted]shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Unedited does not mean contextually accurate.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Oh my God, this MF has a Lemmy account…
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Edited, no. Out of context, yes.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
[deleted]shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
You could if you knew the OP was lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Textually legitimate, contextually legitimate, or subtextually legitimate?
These are all different. Plus you actually have to prove their ages and their local legal ages for it to even begin to be legally binding.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.
hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
What was the calculation again?
20/2 + 7 = 17, he’s literally below the date range calculation.
And arguable you change so much between 15 and 20, I always hated the thought of dating a 19yo at 23. This is way off.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.