Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old)
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
No, he (an adult) is weirdly obsessed with a boy (a MINOR) 6 years younger than him. This is effing disgusting and I can’t interpret it any other way. Him wanting to be shipped (which is typically a ROMANTIC pairing) with this boy coupled with wanting to go on a double date with him (“dates” can technically be platonic but not in this context) is weird and definitely romantic.
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
[deleted]shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Unedited does not mean contextually accurate.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
[deleted]shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
AuroraGlamour@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Oh my God, this MF has a Lemmy account…
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Edited, no. Out of context, yes.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
You could if you knew the OP was lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
[deleted]ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Textually legitimate, contextually legitimate, or subtextually legitimate?
These are all different. Plus you actually have to prove their ages and their local legal ages for it to even begin to be legally binding.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.
hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What was the calculation again?
20/2 + 7 = 17, he’s literally below the date range calculation.
And arguable you change so much between 15 and 20, I always hated the thought of dating a 19yo at 23. This is way off.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 days ago
ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee 6 days ago
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 days ago
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.