Comment on Controversial question
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month agoIt wasn’t exactly a close race. You’d be accusing the DNC of fabricating Millions of ballots.
Comment on Controversial question
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month agoIt wasn’t exactly a close race. You’d be accusing the DNC of fabricating Millions of ballots.
conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Well, no, not of fabricating ballots. I said I think they had a thumb on the scales, that neither race was fair, not that the votes were fake. So, it’s more like I’m accusing them of giving their candidate of choice significant advantages over the others, which is not something you could call a fair race.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
TBH they didn’t even need to include third parties on their ballots from the start. They had all the power in the world to Exclude Bernie. If they were that opposed then why would they even risk it?
conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Nah, miss me with that shit. The way super delegates were set up in the ‘16 primary was total crap, I remember that the media had basically called it for Hillary on almost day 1 of the primary season because every superdelegate announced (before their state primary!) that they were going for Hillary. I think that the HRC campaign really thought they were going to fold in all of the Bernie voters’ votes, money, and energy.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Delegation process aside, millions more people still choce the winners.