It’s the same person as the other posts. Not a second person.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
So as a word to all those who are onlookers here and are wondering what’s going on, this is the second person so far who has tried to participate in the same mass slander of me, as has been happening around the web. I figured this might happen, which is why I can redirect to my complete perspective, which proves the original asker/poster wrong. Ironically, the one thing they’re consistently right about are their words “don’t believe everything you hear”, which also applies to things that seem convincing enough not to consult both sides.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 week ago
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Could something be done about it then? It’s using a serious place as a way to incite a reaction with a combination of slander and doxxing. The same kind of thing happened elsewhere, and the people in charge there, from looking into it, can attest the campaign against me is little more than a means to pit people against an undesired person.
Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf 1 week ago
It’s not doxxing for people to mention your alias, which you’ve publicly posted throughout the internet on your numerous accounts, in posts. You aren’t actually concerned about doxxing, you want this post to get deleted because as my other thread in another instance and another community shows, people in the comments don’t believe your “it’s all slander” excuses and manipulation once they actually click on those links and see the evidence for themselves.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It is doxxing going by the definition laid out in the TOS. And it would be in most over places, because it’s still locally undisclosed personal information. As has been discovered by a rogue admin, some of what you say I have disclosed in fact hasn’t been disclosed, some not anywhere. When you look up my name, for example, what do you find? Just the slander your likes have been spreading everywhere.
You aren’t actually concerned about doxxing, you want this post to get deleted
Spoken like someone who came storming in not caring about the TOS. I strive to go by the TOS wherever I go, which might be why, aside from DA, the only places I’ve been given the boot from (out of the thousands of places I’m in) are those where it’s stated that who is banned is up to unspoken rules and opinions admins might have. And even these I respect, and I don’t go anywhere that isn’t my business.
When it comes to how to react, admins know better. Critical thinkers know better. Your puppets, be them hands-on or inspired, don’t. There lies the difference. I know my people. It doesn’t help peoples’ cases when they admit to not looking into it all before reacting. Your closing argument, as well as having a deceptive premise, just screams “I don’t care that the people in charge made this place with their own hands, I’m going to defy them”, which you did by using a serious center as a means to incite a reaction. So you’re one to talk (especially about boundaries).
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 week ago
You both should report, block, and move on from eachother.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Funny thing about that, I have. But one side doesn’t give up.
Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf 1 week ago
Just so people are aware, the link is to shinigamiookamiryuu’s blog, deviantartdramahub, and the ask is one that they’ve sent themselves.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
First of all, ad hominem. Second, it is nothing more than falsely-concluded speculation to say I asked myself. Third, I don’t even sound how you claim/imply I do.
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
That’s not an ad hominem. Don’t use words you don’t know the meaning to.
If somebody insults you while also attacking an argument you made, that’s not an ad hominem. An ad hominem is specifically only when someone uses a personal attack to attempt to directly refute your argument. And even then, just because something is a logical fallacy, doesn’t mean it’s a bad argument. That’s called the Fallacy fallacy. Good arguments can still include logical fallacies such as ad hominems.
For example, if I say Kanye West is wrong about Jews being untrustworthy because he’s a shitty person and a Nazi, that’s an ad hominem. But it’s also true. The personal attack takes nothing away from the validity of my argument.
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
And randomly claiming or bringing up the authenticity of what they think was said to be someone’s voice (as a form of a comeback) doesn’t fall under that?