It is doxxing going by the definition laid out in the TOS. And it would be in most over places, because it’s still locally undisclosed personal information. As has been discovered by a rogue admin, some of what you say I have disclosed in fact hasn’t been disclosed, some not anywhere. When you look up my name, for example, what do you find? Just the slander your likes have been spreading everywhere.
You aren’t actually concerned about doxxing, you want this post to get deleted
Spoken like someone who came storming in not caring about the TOS. I strive to go by the TOS wherever I go, which might be why, aside from DA, the only places I’ve been given the boot from (out of the thousands of places I’m in) are those where it’s stated that who is banned is up to unspoken rules and opinions admins might have. And even these I respect, and I don’t go anywhere that isn’t my business.
When it comes to how to react, admins know better. Critical thinkers know better. Your puppets, be them hands-on or inspired, don’t. There lies the difference. I know my people. It doesn’t help peoples’ cases when they admit to not looking into it all before reacting. Your closing argument, as well as having a deceptive premise, just screams “I don’t care that the people in charge made this place with their own hands, I’m going to defy them”, which you did by using a serious center as a means to incite a reaction. So you’re one to talk (especially about boundaries).
Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf 1 week ago
Why are you lying?
www.instagram.com/youareaunitofpower/
www.asexuality.org/en/…/181820-tynan-laird/
www.artgram.co/xxoreothecrowxx
…theforce.net/…/would-the-emperor-being-destroyed…
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Funny thing about that, I’m not lying.
Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf 1 week ago
These were literally the first results. Lying to onlookers is not a good look. Image
shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Searches manifest themselves differently for everyone. But in all of them, the majority is slander against me, virtually nothing but false complaints about me that are absolutist in their measures to paint me as some kind of negative individual. Even when I am condemnable, and I apologize, your approach and the approach of others is to speak for the person who forgave me and invalidate that, as I explained in an explanation of my perspective that is now getting flak because the next complaint is “it was asked by an anon, therefore it must be the person asking themself the question”. Which isn’t even abnormal, as some of the slander against me pulls people in based on association with me, sometimes claiming they are me so that additional claims can be added.