Not really.
You make some points I agree with, you make some points I’m neutral on, and you make some points I disagree with.
In nearly all cases though, you appear to take an insular view which comes across as confrontational and adds little to the discussion but a sour taste.
It’s pointless discussing a topic with you when you either take a deep rooted view with no opportunity for open discussion, and take a childish “I told you so” position when hearing a dissenting view.
That’s likely why you are getting downvotes. Other views may apply.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 days ago
I’ve been searching on Project 25 for about 45 minutes now. I haven’t been able to find anyone who both (a) summarizes the document and (b) provides citations in the form of page numbers for their claims about what it says.
I’m tempted to just read the whole thing and then publish my own summary.
But until I do that, I’m in the dark about what it says. According to ChatGPT,
Nothing about making gay marriage illegal, nor anything about rounding queer people into camps. But ChatGPT could be wrong. I don’t know.
What have you read about Project 2025? Did you save the links of things you read about it? Can you link me to whatever convinced you of this?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 days ago
independent.co.uk/…/idaho-supreme-court-obergefel…