Comment on [deleted]
db2@lemmy.world 5 weeks agotf are you on about? You asked for an answer, that’s it. I’m not responsible for whether you like the answer or not.
Comment on [deleted]
db2@lemmy.world 5 weeks agotf are you on about? You asked for an answer, that’s it. I’m not responsible for whether you like the answer or not.
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
But you’re just proving the point.
db2@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Image
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Look i can do a meme too
Image
meco03211@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That’s like saying a prosecutor should also present the defense. It’s not their job. That’s yours. You need to judge how accurate the information is and find ways to verify it. Qs blindly accept any information their side presents without any attempt to critically assess its validity. They also ignore contrary information with similar effort. It’s what makes them so dangerous. A bad actor on “their side” can manipulate them simply by speaking. A good actor on the “other side” could be 100% factual with ample sourcing and citing and will never convince them of the truth.