Comment on Anon gets rid of crackheads
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 days agoSo you’re saying you don’t believe women can be heroes?
That’s super sexist.
Comment on Anon gets rid of crackheads
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 days agoSo you’re saying you don’t believe women can be heroes?
That’s super sexist.
the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
They can be, if they change their gender identity. Same way they’d become actors or waiters. Blame the 8 languages duct taped together that form English.
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 days ago
There’s no need. “An actor” / “a hero” is already a gender neutral term in common usage, no matter how archaic your inner world is or whatever conservative bumfucknowhere you live in.
the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
So the male version of the word is the default? That’s sexist.
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 days ago
The lemma is the default.
Okay so what youre saying is that we should differentiate between male and female actors with specific words to… ensure heteronormativity in the way you see it? Despite feminists calling the exact opposite for several decades before you were even born?
downloads.bbc.co.uk/…/weekender_actor_070406.pdf
Then, if we jump forward to the 1970s and 1980s, women began to choose the term ‘actor’ instead of ‘actress’ as a direct result of the women’s movement and an awareness of gender bias in language. Women began to take back the term ‘actor’, and it’s often used today. Zoë Wannamaker explains that in the 1970s and 1980s there was ‘a stigma’ – a feeling that people disapproved – of being called an actress. This was because the word actress seemed to have the ‘connotation’, or suggested meaning, of being a prostitute
So just so you know, you’re insisting on calling all women’s whores by implication. Sexist as fuck
You need to do better, no matter how archaic your inner world is or whatever conservative bumfucknowhere you live in.