Comment on Anon doesn't wash
Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoThe implication is that you think chicken shit protects eggs. That is what your words said, that is what they implicate.
You can argue what you meant until the stars die. It doesn’t change anything.
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, that’s what you inferred from them, incorrectly.
Exactly. Everyone here knows what I meant, except you, who wanted to boast with their chicken expertise, so you had to pretend as if I had meant that excrement is protective. And it would be exceedingly hilariously of you to tell me what I meant with my words.
We all know how strong a disgust reflex shit causes. We know it’s not healthy to eat it. Thats why — for the the majority of us — that can be left as an implication.
You can pretend until the stats side indeed. You’ll still be wrong.
Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Got it buddy, you definitely know English better than I do. Continue on, definitely speaking English clearly and correctly.
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Are you pretending you don’t understand that autocorrect obviously changed “stars die” to “stats side”, when I’m painfully obviously copying your earlier message?
You’re pretending that autocorrect mistakes have something to do with linguistic capacity?
Alright. Did you infer or imply that? ;>
Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I read what I write after I write it.
Unlike you, clearly, which is why you have “typos”. Though, at this point, I’m genuinely convinced you’re AI.
I’ve pointed out why you’re wrong, you’ve decided to argue. You are wrong, every English teacher will tell you you’re wrong, and anyone that can write in English correctly will tell you you’re wrong.
Silence, now. Before I link you the wikipedia definition of Dunning-Kruger.
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well since you can’t point to a single mistake I’ve made and don’t understand the difference between “infer” and “imply”, yes, I think I do have a better grasp on English than you.