Comment on Can enough solar pannels decrease the global temps?
deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 days agoBurning coal doesn’t significantly heat the planet. The CO2 released by this causes solar heating to be more effective by trapping the escaping infrared radiation.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Participate pollution melts glaciers which increases the temperature long after it fucks shit up by trapping heat in the atmosphere and blocking photosynthesis.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Just saying “watts staying underground” is a poor explanation. That’s an insignificant amount of energy compared to what the sun is delivering and what’s being trapped by CO2. “Carbon staying underground” is much more the priority.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Which is why I clarified for someone what someone else likely meant…
I’m not sure what you’re doing here, do you want me to go complain to the person who first used that phrasing on your behalf?
deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Didn’t realize users changed, my bad.
MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
That’s not really relevant. Fine particulate emissions from coal power plants, which are already mostly gone in the US but are still used around the world, don’t travel a really long distance.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, they do.
Precipitate pollution from coal use in India and China is making it to the northern glaciars.
It doesn’t need to be a lot, a small speck on a glacier can “snowball” into a substantial melt because black soot gets hotter than white snow.
nbcnews.com/…/coal-soot-darkened-melted-glaciers-…
It’s not like the soot has to blanket it, especially when they’re already melting.