Comment on Anon doesn't wash
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day agoYeah. The presence of shit shows they’re not washed.
Unwashed eggs song need refrigeration.
No-one else thought I wasn’t claiming shit has protective properties, so perhaps you should consider that you might be mistakenly in who has expressed what incorrectly.
It isn’t my fault that your literary skills aren’t as good as your chicken farming skills.
Okay imagine you and a good friend often get to go cruising in your mom’s car when she’s not using it. One day you tell them, “Mom’s gonna be home all weekend, that’s why we can go to the party we didn’t have a ride to”.
But huh. Wait a minute? How does your mom staying at home mean you suddenly get to go somewhere? Huh? Your friend wouldn’t definitely be mighty confused and ask you to try expressing your thoughts more clearly, wouldn’t they? Right? Becsuse how on Earth would your mom sitting on a sofa mean your travel problem is gone? She’s sitting. Still. At home. How is it relevant??? :Oooo
Jax@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
Stop.
Use English correctly or don’t, I don’t care.
Dasus@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
There’s no need to be ashamed just because you didn’t know something as simple as what an implication is.
I’m sure you can figure out that “might be mistakenly in…” is obviously the phone’s autocorrect correcting an adjective to an adverb. Same with “would” to “wouldn’t.”
You could’ve just avoided answering, but felt some sort of compulsion to, because you don’t like that I pointed out a mistake you made. It’s very understandable, I remember feeling the same occasionally as a teen.
However it is a bit ironic that you would try to pretend that I’m the less literate one when you didn’t know what an implication is.
Jax@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
The implication is that you think chicken shit protects eggs. That is what your words said, that is what they implicate.
You can argue what you meant until the stars die. It doesn’t change anything.
Dasus@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
No, that’s what you inferred from them, incorrectly.
Exactly. Everyone here knows what I meant, except you, who wanted to boast with their chicken expertise, so you had to pretend as if I had meant that excrement is protective. And it would be exceedingly hilariously of you to tell me what I meant with my words.
We all know how strong a disgust reflex shit causes. We know it’s not healthy to eat it. Thats why — for the the majority of us — that can be left as an implication.
You can pretend until the stats side indeed. You’ll still be wrong.