Youtube is insisting I sign in to prove my age before I can watch that video.
This video may be inappropriate for some users.
Who? Corporate executives?
Comment on Caption this.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 days agoAnd the man ain’t subtle about it.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
chuymatt@startrek.website 1 day ago
It has SWARES!! SWARES, I tell you!
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Somehow in spite of his negative comments his accomplishments still get recognition from the authority structure. Whereas in the social mediasphere if he so much as Liked a disapproved tweet he would be crowd-demonized and his career would mean nothing.
lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
I think that, vocal complainers aside, he’s still overall fairly popular. A popular white man saying wise stuff is a great opportunity to signal how committed you are to science without having to put actually significant amounts of money on the line or entering the minefield that is angering the anti-“woke” crowd. He’s a safe investment in public appearances.
Doesn’t mean they’ll have to listen to him. He gets a more sombre version of the Jester’s Privilege that allows him to say whatever he wants, they’ll nod and applaud and perform all the gestures of approval, but they won’t actually change anything.
The other half of it is probably the Internet Outrage culture that sees inciting content get more engagement and boosted visibility in a self-perpetuating cycle of upset. Legitimate criticism drowns in a sea of bullshit, everyone’s pissed off and we’re all easily swept up in the current of emotion. If we’re not mad at one person, we’re mad at the people pointlessly or excessively mad at them. If we try to stem against that, we’re dogpiled by loud complainers while quiet agreement leaves an upvote and moves on.