It’s been a long time, but I very much remember it being played as the powers that be are simply afraid to acknowledge that V is back. They do attack Harry’s story some to help justify keeping their heads in the sand, but that didn’t seem like the point to me.
Comment on Anon is a winner
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 days agoYeah but the movies specifically frame it more as “the ministry has been infiltrated” and less as “Harry, your story is shady af”
AEsheron@lemmy.world 3 days ago
tetris11@lemmy.world 4 days ago
The movies also frames Dumbledore as a hard boiled unhinged detective who slams people against walls and shakes them down for information, whereas the book totally missed out on that great aspect of his personality. Swings and roundabouts
colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
DIDYOUPUTCHANAMEINTHAGOBLETOFFIYAAAAHHH
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Definitely, Dumbledore is much better in the movies. I think the books overexplore his relationship with Voldemort and he comes off a bit daft. All of his interactions with Voldemort are like:
Voldemort: Genocide is cool, right? Dumbledore: No, it isn’t V: You’re right. Anyway, theoretically, how can I become more stronger? D: Are you gonna do a genocide? V: high pitched Whaaaaat…?! Naaaaaaaah! I would never do that! D: Ok, here’s how you become more powerful…
colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
This is a hot take I’ve never heard before
EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 3 days ago
A turd is better when you can both see and smell it rather than when you can only smell it
tetris11@lemmy.world 2 days ago
He’s a man of ACTION in the films, and not a man of giving fools a second chance.