BatmanAoD
@BatmanAoD@lemmy.world
- Comment on anyway, i started blastin' 1 week ago:
The stones were destroyed before the remaining Avengers found Thanos. That’s why they went back in time. And they needed Tony not to be killed by the snap (hence Strange’s bargain) so that he could invent time travel without relying on the time stone.
- Comment on anyway, i started blastin' 1 week ago:
You literally see individual people dissolving, and others being unaffected. How is this unclear?
- Comment on anyway, i started blastin' 1 week ago:
His crush is literally Death, so it kinda makes sense that genocide would be the way to get her attention.
- Comment on I swear to god 1 week ago:
Wat
- Comment on I swear to god 1 week ago:
But the human portion has normal human proportions (though potentially scaled up a little). Why would being on a giraffe’s body change that?
- Comment on The Divine Dick 2 weeks ago:
That only applies to humans. So Jesus was certainly cut (and uncontroversially), but if God the Father has genitalia, he may not be; same for the holy ghost.
- Comment on The Divine Dick 2 weeks ago:
Pretty sure the official position in most sects, including Catholicism, is that God is not “male”, but singular male pronouns are nevertheless the only “correct” pronouns for “Him”.
- Comment on The most powerful brain on Twitter 2 weeks ago:
For blue checks it’s now much higher
- Comment on Is there a conversational AI chat bot that isn't... So horny? Preferably free, but I'll pay a little bit of it's good. 2 weeks ago:
No Claude? It’s pretty good in my experience, and I follow someone on twitter who does absolutely wild things with it.
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
The word “prompt” is used correctly here:
My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then “paste without formatting” in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P
That’s the comment you originally responded to. It’s two sentences (with a comma splice) and very clearly has nothing to do with AI.
Misreading this and misunderstanding it, as simple as it is, is embarrassing but understandable. Commenting “I hope you lose your degree” because you can’t read 28 words of text without drawing completely the wrong conclusion is, again, embarrassing, but not dire.
Arguing in multiple comment threads about it, while your misunderstanding is repeatedly and clearly explained to you, and then saying you “stand by” all of this, makes it clear that you are a complete idiot.
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
Do you mean that you think a student not using an AI might do that by accident? Otherwise I’m not sure how it’s relevant that there might be a real person with that name.
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
Holy shit, “prompt” is not primarily an AI word. I get not reading an entire article or essay before commenting, but maybe you should read an entire couple of sentences before making a complete ass of yourself for multiple comments in a row. If you can’t manage that, just say nothing! It’s that easy!
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
Wot? They didn’t say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
Presumably the teacher knows which students would need that, and accounts for it.
- Comment on Clever, clever 3 weeks ago:
…whose published work on the essay’s subject you can cite?