LustyArgonianMana
@LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
Dominatrix in the PNW onlyfans.com/lusty.argonian.mana
- Comment on And they mocked me for my WoW subscription 😗 6 days ago:
A friend of mine started playing again and said it was really good.
You gotta find a good guild to dungeon crawl or raid with. My favorite thing was being raid lead during Mists and working with a big team. I did some competitive WoW back then, and even played with Asmongold, my character is in some of his old videos. Makes me pretty sad how he turned out.
- Comment on my smart hot air fryer, every single time 6 days ago:
Yikes
- Comment on At least it works 6 days ago:
Stop, you’re making me butter about the Sims lol
- Comment on Lasagnaius 6 days ago:
Friesius
- Comment on And they mocked me for my WoW subscription 😗 6 days ago:
I did hear WoW is fun again
- Comment on I will burn this fucker to the ground... internally 1 week ago:
And burn CDs 💪
- Comment on wax on 1 week ago:
Me too, real “Thanks, I hate it”
- Comment on I Quit 1 week ago:
Same and to include genius IQ
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
No. Thinking matters.
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
Okay, but that wasn’t your original assertion. Also, there’s no way to prove this claim anyway about relevancy. Like God is pretty irrelevant these days, why would a painting of him really matter today? Why does David matter? They are just made up stories.
Again, you’re just saying stuff to say stuff
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
The art world decided to turn its nose up at this kind of popular art and pivot toward controversial, shocking, and lazy (looking) art intended to provoke all kinds of responses (many negative). This continues to drive a perception in the public of an artist community that is increasingly elitist and out of touch.
People forget that it wasn’t always this way.
Banksy has cute and beautiful art.
The painting’s location and grandiosity prove my point. It is still a beautiful piece but it wasn’t painted to be accessible to the common man or to be a feel good piece - it was meant to inspire awe and divine worship. Michaelangelo commonly made pieces like this, including ofc David, a LARGE and detailed piece, which is why he was sought after by the wealthy. He was not an accessible every day common man artist like Banksy lol.
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
I didn’t cherry pick, I attacked your premise with examples that break it.
Those are fine too, but my point was artists who create technical pieces of things that are beautiful, that beautiful pieces indeed are still appreciated today and I wouldn’t call the previously listed artist’s works any of what you described previously.
The entire Catholic mass was told in Latin at that time specifically to reduce accessibility and increase reverence. I think you underestimate Catholic cuntiness. They were putting people in their place with all of that. If you don’t understand how Catholicism was used by Rome and then later the world to keep slaves in line and convince poor people to fight wars, then you are missing a lot of info on the world. Most Abrahamic religions are meant for that, that’s what the legend of Abraham is about.
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
It was literally made by Bob Ross to teach everyone how to paint something decent in ~30minutes. Part of that is enjoying the painting process and not getting frustrated. But it was absolutely instructional, he gave specific colors and techniques because he was teaching us how to paint…
- Comment on Some crimes are unforgivable 3 weeks ago:
Wow, what a bunch of didn’t happen.
Art has always valued technical skills, however some artists do not need to be particularly technical to convey artistic meaning.
Banksy is a technical artist who also uses creative meanings on his art itself.
Jono (charcoal artist) is HIGHLY technical, has art pieces that are probably more detailed than a literal photograph.
Thomas Schaller, Colin Thompson, and many many many more famous artists with excellent technical skills, all very favored.
Bob Ross teaches beginner’s level technical skills. That means that we can all make our own paintings. It means that it isn’t often expensive to buy those pieces because we can make them. He was teaching people how to paint, that still makes him completely relevant to the art world. It’s just not exactly mentally stimulating once you already know how to paint all those pieces - often artists do things called studies, and then they move on to the next study.
Btw the entire point of those churches and paintings was so the common person felt overwhelmed and unworthy. It wasn’t made for love per se, it was made to give an image of power and divine right.
- Comment on So she's saying that she's a sexual bull? 3 weeks ago:
Um, yeah. Like for instance, we have a video that CBS put out, directly after the shooting someone is scanning the crowd with their camera and caught video of the shooter running off the roof. Again, RIGHT AFTER. People are just starting to run out of the event, realizing what happened.
Yet…! The gun is an old WW1 Mauser that requires a screwdriver to disassemble. The FBI later said they found a screwdriver on the roof (even though crime scene photos of the roof don’t show it) and claim that he unscrewed this gun in almost an instant, left the screwdriver on the roof, jumped down with the gun taken apart, and then reassembled the gun and left it for cops to find.
Not to mention they had his body on Airforce 1 well before a forensic autopsy could typically be completed.
- Comment on So she's saying that she's a sexual bull? 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on yeah everything is probably made of like, idk, earth water, fire and air or something idrk 3 weeks ago:
So in that equation, let’s say mass 1 is earth. G and distance will be equal in both instances of dropping.
Rewrite equation:
Distance^2/ G*mass 1 = mass 2 /force
And
Distance^2/ G*mass 1 = mass 3 /force
Therefore,
Mass 2 /force = mass 3 /force
F = m*a
Mass 2 / mass 2*a = mass 3 / mass 3 * a
This cancels out to show that a = a, their acceleration is the same.
- Comment on yeah everything is probably made of like, idk, earth water, fire and air or something idrk 4 weeks ago:
Interesting way to admit you were wrong
- Comment on yeah everything is probably made of like, idk, earth water, fire and air or something idrk 4 weeks ago:
You didn’t read it, it is literally telling you you are wrong.
By experimenting with the acceleration of different materials, Galileo Galilei determined that gravitation is independent of the amount of mass being accelerated
“… in a uniform gravitational field all objects, regardless of their composition, fall with precisely the same acceleration.”
What is now called the “Einstein equivalence principle” states that the weak equivalence principle [above] holds
Tests of the weak equivalence principle are those that verify the equivalence of gravitational mass and inertial mass. An obvious test is dropping different objects and verifying that they land at the same time. Historically this was the first approach – though probably not by Galileo’s Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment[19]: 19–21 but instead earlier by Simon Stevin,[20] who dropped lead balls of different masses off the Delft churchtower and listened for the sound of them hitting a wooden plank.
Between 1589 and 1592,[1] the Italian scientist Galileo Galilei (then professor of mathematics at the University of Pisa) is said to have dropped “unequal weights of the same material” from the Leaning Tower of Pisa to demonstrate that their time of descent was independent of their mass
Newton measured the period of pendulums made with different materials as an alternative test giving the first precision measurements.[3] Loránd Eötvös’s approach in 1908 used a very sensitive torsion balance to give precision approaching 1 in a billion. Modern experiments have improved this by another factor of a million.
Experiments are still being performed at the University of Washington which have placed limits on the differential acceleration of objects towards the Earth, the Sun and towards dark matter in the Galactic Center.[45] Future satellite experiments[46] – Satellite Test of the Equivalence Principle[47] and Galileo Galilei – will test the weak equivalence principle in space, to much higher accuracy.[48]
With the first successful production of antimatter, in particular anti-hydrogen, a new approach to test the weak equivalence principle has been proposed. Experiments to compare the gravitational behavior of matter and antimatter are currently being developed.
- Comment on yeah everything is probably made of like, idk, earth water, fire and air or something idrk 4 weeks ago:
- Comment on How did easy access to Porn while growing up impacted Gen-Z ? 4 weeks ago:
This, and the legends of finding stacks of Playboys in the woods. Hell, back then they would’ve had easier access to CSAM, eg Sugar and Spice magazine
- Comment on Roll it up, light it up, smoke it up 4 weeks ago:
Look like rolling pollies to me
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
Lol mind reading again?
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
Coming from the person who called me insane and crazy like Qanon many times lol, including in your first response to me.
You are genuinely exhibiting signs of a mental health event and spammed this comment several times. It is a mental health event. Go to the ER. Your brain is doing weird shit.
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
I accept that you think that.
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
Mental
Health
Event
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
I can see you’re having a worsening of your mental health event, I’m done talking to you. Have fun with your creative writing exercise!
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
I can see you’re having a worsening of your mental health event, I’m done talking to you. Have fun with your creative writing exercise!
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
No.
- Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases 😔 4 weeks ago:
A strawman is taking someone’s genuine argument and then distorting or misrepresenting it to make it easier to attack. A strawman argument isn’t valid and it isn’t paraphrasing. Generally when people paraphrase in good faith, they will ask if they said the paraphrase correctly and will correct themselves if it is incorrect.
They cannot remove just anything, they have to have a legal basis to do so and can be sued, less government control than now.
I said propaganda warfare, meaning online propaganda warfare that started in 2016, a new type of warfare. Obviously.
Again, it is less control than what exists presently already via private companies that would still exist later anyway. We still can advocate for progress even within capitalism and fascism, that’s how we dig out of both.
Propaganda warfare in my comment is specifically referencing online warfare since 2016, and it is absolutely Putin’s baby.
You did slightly better on this comment in terms of nonsensical spewing, nice
