Hamartia
@Hamartia@lemmy.world
- Comment on Donald Trump says Andy Burnham told him he will ‘open up North Sea oil’ 11 hours ago:
You should. Very well written comedy. Hasn’t really aged that much.
- Comment on Wrongful Arrests at Palestine Action Demo, Campaigners Say 11 hours ago:
I was there today supporting those that were escalating the protest. There were some silly arrests amongst all the ‘legitimate’ arrests. One guy got arrested for singing a song ridiculing the proscription and a young girl got detained for an hour who was there in a supporting role like myself but a cop hallucinated that she had made the statement.
It was inspirational seeing so many people making heartfelt speech’s about this slide into tyranny, putting their own liberty on the line.
- Comment on Supreme court says Palestine Action co-founder can challenge ban on group 11 hours ago:
We don’t actually have a lot of confidence that the Supreme Court will deliver a better decision. But we have to get turned back there before we can take this to the European Court of Human Rights where we will have a much better chance of not having an institutionally ring wing judge.
- Comment on 🤓☝️ 1 day ago:
Who’s Gilgamesh bro💔?
- Comment on POV: You just said something the Tesseract Developer didn't like 4 days ago:
Yeah much better for his own growth if he stuck around and holds his hands up to criticism
- Comment on Has anobody seen Odyssey? 1 week ago:
You are alive my son!
- Comment on Has anobody seen Odyssey? 1 week ago:
You should watch the trailer here first
- Comment on Probably accurate 3 weeks ago:
It’s only two and a half Henry Kissingers away
- Comment on Irish Hotel Cancels Conference for Peter Thiel’s Secretive Group 3 weeks ago:
Ehh… the ownership of the hotel has links to the event. It’s probably more the case that the event drew too much attention so the ghouls were getting leery of attending
- Comment on 3 weeks ago:
Fair enough. Cheap and cheerful.
- Comment on 3 weeks ago:
Buy last years model second hand
- Comment on Palestine Action Defendants Apply to Remove ‘Biased’ Judge 1 month ago:
The letter if anyone is interested:
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office
Hearing number: T2024 0175 / T 2024 7092
Woolwich Crown Crown Court, Trial 1 17/11/25-04/02/26, Retrial 13/04/26-05/05/26
COMPLAINT AGAINST MR JUSTICE JOHNSON: BIAS AND DISCRIMINATORY CONDUCT
Summary
This complaint is brought to hold Mr Justice Johnson to account for his manifest bias and discrimination in handling the two trials of ‘the Filton 6’ (Charlotte Head, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, Samuel Corner, Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin).
The case concerned the group’s break-in to a factory owned by Elbit Systems in Bristol in August 2024, to prevent drones being supplied to the Israeli government to kill Palestinian civilians.
The political context for the case made it imperative that the judge was seen to be acting fairly and impartially. Through his actions, however, Mr Justice Johnson betrayed a loss of objectivity and a personal animosity towards the defendants and the Palestinian cause, incompatible with the role of a judge.
This complaint does not directly concern the many contentious decisions made by the judge, which are more properly the basis for grounds of appeal to the Court of Appeal. These include his decision to remove from the jury’s consideration all available legal defences and the extreme restrictions he imposed on the defendants explaining their conscientious motivations to the jury.
Rather it concerns three decisions taken by the judge, which give rise to the perception of bias:
First, he treated the defendants’ conscientious motivation to prevent Israel killing Palestinian civilians as an aggravating feature rather than a mitigating feature
Second, he acted unlawfully in referring the lead defence barrister, Rajiv Menon KC for contempt of court
Third, he acted vindictively, and without support from the prosecution, in remanding Charlotte Head, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani into custody, following their convictions for criminal damage
Ground 1 - The judge has acted in a way which appears biased and discriminatory by treating the defendants’ motivation to stop Israel committing war crimes as a potentially aggravating factor
Only once previously has anyone been sentenced on the basis of a ‘terrorist connection’ without being charged with a terrorist offence. That was Ahmed Hassan, ‘the Parsons Green bomber’, who was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2018 for a bomb which injured 51 people on a tube train.
Damage to property has been a recurring feature of protest campaigns from the Suffragettes and the women of Greenham Common to Extinction Rebellion and the Trident Ploughshares movement. Military equipment has often been the target. Indeed the subject matter of the case in R v Jones, famous for Lord Hoffman’s dicta on civil disobedience, concerned extensive damage to military aircraft destined to support the invasion of Iraq (see Lord Bingham’s introduction to the facts of the case at [3]). Hitherto it has always been recognised that conscientious motivation should be treated as a mitigating factor. For this reason the defendants in Jones were sentenced with conditional discharges (see the remarks of Lord Hoffman at [89]):
“The police and prosecutors … behave with restraint and the magistrates impose sentences which take the conscientious motives of the protesters into account. The conditional discharges ordered by the magistrates in the cases which came before them exemplifies their sensitivity to these conventions.” [emphasis added]
Yet Mr Justice Johnson has indicated that these defendants’ motivation to prevent Israel committing war crimes and acts of genocide is an aggravating factor such as to bring it within the scope of the Terrorism Act, and consequently that they may be sentenced as terrorists:
“On s1(1)(b) of the TA 2000, Rajiv Menon KC and others strongly argued that influencing government was not the purpose of the action – the purpose of the action was to damage weapons and save lives – I accept that this was one motivating factor – but that does not mean that another purpose was not to damage property to be made available to the Israeli government and thereby influence the Israeli government”.
According to Mr Justice Johnson, the defendants’ intention to prevent Israel using drones to kill Palestinian civilians, is what brings their actions within the scope of the Terrorism Act. By the same logic, all peace campaigners who cause damage to military property to stop war crimes are terrorists. That is not only absurd. It is contrary to the basic legal principle that a conscientious motivation is a mitigating factor, not a reason to sentence people more harshly.
By treating, uniquely, the actions of the Filton 6 as on a par with the Parsons Green bomber, the judge reveals his loss of judgment and a discriminatory mindset towards the defendants.
Ground 2 - the judge has given rise to the appearance of bias by unlawfully referring the lead defence barrister, Rajiv Menon KC, for contempt of court between trials
The judge unlawfully referred the lead defence barrister in this case for contempt of court for his closing speech, attempting to bypass the Office of the Attorney General.
Unusually, the judge’s conduct in this matter resulted in public criticism from across the legal profession, including a public statement from the Bar Council, in which the Chair of the Bar Council, Kirsty Brimelow KC, refers to the matter as a ‘troubling episode’[1]:
“I have followed with concern this exceptional attempt to refer Rajiv Menon KC for contempt of court. A barrister has a duty to represent their clients fearlessly and Judge instigated contempt proceedings risk a chilling effect on the profession. The Court of Appeal judgment is welcomed, and it is hoped that this now is an end of this troubling episode."
Garden Court North Chambers expressed their opposition to the judge’s approach even more forcefully:
“This prosecution should be unequivocally condemned as a grave attack on the longstanding principle that barristers must be able to represent their clients fearlessly, independently, and without intimidation.”[2]
The consequence of the judge’s unlawful action had an prejudicial impact on the defendants, including by i) distracting Rajiv Menon KC with contempt proceedings in between the trial and the retrial; ii) contributing to an atmosphere which resulted in five of the six defendants parting with their defence barristers prior to closing speeches in the second trial, and delivering the speeches themselves.
The discriminatory nature of Mr Justice Johnson’s action is made all the clearer by his failure to address the many public statements prejudicial to the defendants made in advance of the trial by Yvette Cooper MP and others, see “Yvette Cooper wrote Palestine Action article despite CPS warning it could affect trial”, Guardian[3].
Ground 3 - the judge acted vindictively in remanding to custody Charlotte Head, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani following their convictions for criminal damage.
Charlotte Head, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, three young women who refuse to be bystanders to genocide, had been remanded in custody for 18 months before the jury on the first trial declined to convict them of any charge, far in excess of the custody time limits. At the end of that trial, Mr Justice Johnson granted them bail.
They had less than 10 weeks out of prison before the start of their second trial. The prosecution did not object to their bail continuing prior to sentencing, yet Mr Justice Johnson of his own motion remanded them in custody nonetheless.
Denying three young women the opportunity to prepare themselves and their families for a further period in prison was cruel and vindictive and not backed by the prosecution.
Conclusion
It should not be possible for observers to discern the political opinions of a judge. No rational observer, however, is left in any doubt regarding the political opinions of Mr Justice Johnson. His rulings are consistent only with a personal conviction that the Israeli government should be free to break international law and to slaughter Palestinians.
Taken together, these three incidents amount to a pattern of exceptional, biased and discriminatory conduct on the part of the judge, for which he should be held to account through the JCIO.
See Annex 1 for list of signatories to this complaint.
[1] Bar Council statement on contempt of court, …org.uk/…/bar-council-statement-on-contempt-of-co…
[2] “Garden Court North stands in solidarity with Rajiv Menon KC as he faces prosecution for contempt of court”, gcnchambers.co.uk/garden-court-north-stands-in-so…
- Comment on UK Police arrests criminal trying to escape 2 months ago:
Yep. Five stars is when you inconvenience a foreign country manufacturing weapons, in the UK, for use in their on going genocide.
- Comment on Footage used in Palestine Action trial contains 'perceived gaps', court hears 3 months ago:
Those two missing camera films should contain the start of the violent interaction. What we are left with shows one of the security guards running towards the protestors carrying a hammer and a whip. And we have the physical evidence where the injury on the face of one of the protestors appears to have been made by a hammer. The same protestor has a bruise on his torso from a blow from a sledge hammer. Which when we next see that same security guard, on the videos made available, he is carrying.
How this fracas started is vitally important for the UK’s government proscription of the group. They desperate to portray them as having violent intent. However the same group made a number of attacks on the manufacturing of arms and other materials destined for Israel’s genocidal army but to this point never hurt anyone.
What the missing footage likely shows is that the protestors where violently assaulted by the guards and by the police that subsequently arrived and that they had a fight or flight reaction.
- Comment on A mess 3 months ago:
It was foretold!
- Comment on Worm doll I sleep with 4 months ago:
- Comment on Average GPA of a billionaire as per the research by University of Boston is 2.9 Why Valedictorians rarely reach this stage? 5 months ago:
- Comment on aspirations 6 months ago:
This is it: low income folks that graduated in '94 were the last to get full student grants and no fees to pay + renting was relatively way cheaper too.
- Comment on Tankie 6 months ago:
Liberals don’t want truth or justice, they want a self serving narrative that disguises their contempt for people they feel are beneath them.
- Comment on If president abductions are something that can apparently just happen how come Putin or Kim Jong Un aren't in some foreign prison right now? 6 months ago:
That’s a design feature.
- Comment on irl shiny 11 months ago:
You’re talking about cock…roaches, yeah?
- Comment on Call your doctor today 1 year ago:
I’ll never forget DRE now
- Comment on Call your doctor today 1 year ago:
I had my first DRE a few months ago. It felt like the Dr thought my butthole was a dog’s mouth with a piece of chocolate in it.
- Comment on Kingdom Come: Deliverance II is coming to GOG this Spring! 1 year ago:
Henrys here! Almost…
- Comment on Let's all make fun of this stupid astrapotherium. 1 year ago:
Oh look, here comes FlyingSquid.
- Comment on Primitive Technology: Two Walled Tiled Hut 1 year ago:
Sometimes there is poetry in our lives
- Comment on Primitive Technology: Two Walled Tiled Hut 1 year ago:
Imagine, years from now, his technology eventually overtaking the rest of the world’s. Powering his city state with cold fusion. Inventing the first warp drive. Etc
All while the rest of us keep on falling back into anti-science fascism because we can’t figure out how to take the mega-rich’s thumb off the scales of democracy/justice.
- Comment on So this is how my neighbor fixes his fence. 1 year ago:
Me too.
- Comment on So this is how my neighbor fixes his fence. 1 year ago:
it’s beyond the pale!
- Comment on I'm sure everyone remembers 1 year ago:
Yhe lack of traffic in London was amazing
