The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.
Why do we separate bathrooms at all, just have full private stalls and a common area for the wash area.
Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access
Submitted 5 months ago by wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee to conservative@lemm.ee
Comments
HorreC@kbin.social 5 months ago
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Not all places do. Alamo in St. Louis just has stalls or urinals. I personally love it. You go wherever you need to go. I admit it’s weird at first but you adjust quickly.
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Conservatives really love policing the genitals of students for some reason.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.
For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months ago
If the article isn’t about genitals than what is it about? What’s the harm in using gender-affirming bathrooms if you take genitals out of the equation?
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 5 months ago
The article is about school policy of student’s use of their respective genders bathroom:
“At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context.”
It is absolutely what it is about.
Do you have anything better than a “no u”?