Comment on Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months agoIf the article isn’t about genitals than what is it about? What’s the harm in using gender-affirming bathrooms if you take genitals out of the equation?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Why are you asking me when i stated no opinion that there is harm. You’re projecting a view on me I didn’t suggest.
I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other. I’m a man. One my coworkers is a trans man. He just goes to the stall and does his business.
I get the concern women may have but that is an issue a woman would need to opine on.
The general argument is safe spaces for women.
It’s something scotus needs to address.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months ago
You claim there is harm, what harm is there?
You claim you don’t have a strong opinion, but you want the highest court in the land’s opinion on what should be a settled matter? Seems like you have a pretty strong opinion, you just don’t want to vocalize it.
If you remove genitals and sex from the equation (something you said to do), what about gender-affirming bathrooms makes them an unsafe space for women? Because at this point we’re talking chromosomal differences and nothing else.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I must have missed where I personally said that. Can you cite where I said that?
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months ago
You can clarify here instead so as to avoid further confusion.
When you remove sex and genitals from the equation, what are you left with that would cause an unsafe space for women?
Maybe the traitorous sexual predator you want to give access to nuclear codes to can help answer this for you.
Pepsi@kbin.social 5 months ago
you need to supreme court to teach you about genitals?
dude there’s tons of health textbooks.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Why are so fascinated with genitals?
Pepsi@kbin.social 5 months ago
mostly fascinated that you don’t get it lol