About 400,000 UK children supported by baby banks, up 11% on previous year

Comments

• RubberDuck@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It is far better to protect them from social media than to protect them from poverty /s

  source

  • Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Aren’t we on this form of social media because we inherently disagree how larger forms (X, FB) are ran and who runs them?

    I don’t necessarily agree with the implementation, but I can definitely see why a reduction in people using those social media could be a net positive for the country.

    Though no disagreement about a 11% increase being shocking…

    source

    • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Seems like a reason to change how those larger form run and who runs them then.

      No algorithms, no dark patterns. No information systems , controlled by billionaires, with a vested interested in what information is shown to whom.

      source