NYTimes. A source to dismiss.
Several Women Who Dated Graham Platner Recall ‘Unsettling’ Behavior
Submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
Submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
NYTimes. A source to dismiss.
MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 weeks ago
I’m so curious about the downvoters. Is it that Platner is on “our side” so they don’t want to see anything negative about him? Are we at the point where we’re the “believe women unless the accusations are levelled at our guy” party?
LordMayor@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Probably, because there seems to be a lot more scrutiny of this guy’s behavior than a lot of other candidates and sitting politicians.
He’s almost definitely an asshole but they really seem to be trying hard to make stuff that’s kinda bad into something disqualifying when there are way bigger fish that could be fried.
This suggests that those in power fear him. People like that.
MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 weeks ago
This doesn’t seem particularly accurate. On the Dems side, they’ve thrown out a lot of members for less (Al Franken screams to mind) and I can’t think of anyone who has had a Nazi tattoo… Platner’s getting hit in part because it’s his first campaign so he hasn’t been any similar scrutiny and sure, if you want to say the DNC elite are working with the media somehow but they’re unearthing the same stuff that’s going to come out in a general election, but it’ll be nastier and harder then.
It’s worth actually reading the article, there’s a lot there that makes me feel *really * uncomfortable. If I were voting in that election, I’d have to think really hard about whether I could in good conscience vote for him and whether that might be betraying who I am and the women in my life. And in a race as close as Maine is going to be (Not sure I would want to bet against Collins) this stuff can make the difference.
If you think back to other candidates in their first campaign, a lot of crazy stuff comes out. (Remember Mark Robinson?) I’m not sure covering our ears is a good strategy. I’d much rather dig pretty hard so we know for danged sure nothing worse is coming out anytime soon. (What do we do if one of his exes alleges mental abuse? Physical?)
I dunno if this is disqualifying but as the party that’s supposed to be the good ones…
reddig33@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This particular NYT story just has the stench of a “swift boat veterans” operation.
en.wikipedia.org/…/Swift_Vets_and_POWs_for_Truth
People’s personal lives are, personal. If he had been shown to have raped someone, or was a pedo, or was demonstratively a massive hypocrite, I’d be more concerned. But I don’t care if someone had an affair or was a messy boyfriend twenty years ago or whatever. I’m more concerned of how they are going to do their job.
I do have concerns this dude could turn out to be another Fetterman. But so far it looks like a risk worth taking because Susan Collins has a horrible voting record.
MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 weeks ago
That seems like a wildly inaccurate comparison. I’m old enough to remember the Swiftboating and had to double check but comparing his actual exes to folks who weren’t there just doesn’t make much sense. To refresh your memory, Swiftboating was super sketchy because, as Wikipedia notes:
To the larger, meh, I don’t care, well, to each their own. I personally feel that some of the physical shit to partners about a dozen years ago is a marker of character and some shit I’m not sure I’m comfortable with. Also having what you know to be a Nazi tattoo and covering it up when you have aspirations of office is, at best, icky.
Were he Republican, I’d be pretty unimpressed. Were he dating a friend or family member, I would damn well be looking for any suspicious bruise and be ready to do something unadvisable if I saw one.