Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

We got a skimmer

⁨532⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/de1d573c-8864-496f-8588-77391352c386.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Engywuck@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    “Sometimes”? Lol.

    source
  • Beth@piefed.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The truth during grad school when you get assigned more reading than is humanly possible. 🥲

    source
  • friendly_ghost@beehaw.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    82% of researchers cite studies without reading them, I’m pretty sure I read this somewhere

    source
    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You seemed to have forgotten to cite your source.

      The actual number is estimated to be 37% according to one study. Nowhere near your number but still pretty high if you ask me. Source

      source
  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’ve even been known to use sci hub! I know right? Call the cops we’ve got a bad mother fucker right here

    source
  • Betch@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I like bad citations on artificial skimmed milk as well.

    source
  • OpenStars@piefed.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    img

    source
  • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I have my PhD now, and have published 3 conference papers and 2 journal articles. I’m not in academia now.

    About half of my academic citations came from a poster I presented at a conference from before I started grad school. A poster that was never uploaded online, has no paper with it, and as far as I know, 15 people have seen in real life.

    They were citing the online abstract, which has no real meat to it, just a single picture of my choosing and a paragraph of text or so.

    Holy shit man. This project was barely science at this point. The methodology was soooo bad, and only made sense because I barely knew what I was doing and the researcher advising me was a bit out of their depth.

    source
  • Water_Melon_boy@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Im genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for “You must cite this much articles” before publishing?

    source
    • waldfee@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I think that has to do with this xkcd:

      When advertisers figure this out, our only weapon will be blue sharpies and “[disputed]”.

      source
      • Water_Melon_boy@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Sounds Legit!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Allero@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Often yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.

      source
  • iconic_admin@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The abstract is there for a reason. Shrug.

    source