Its truly amazing how some news sites like BBC don't lie, but spin the facts and actively gaslight

⁨3⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨iamtanmay@wolfballs.com⁩ to ⁨freeforum@wolfballs.com⁩

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-57552527

According to BBC:

"A study shows the vaccine accumulating in the ovaries - False ....

Only 0.1% of the total dose ended up in the animals' ovaries...

Well, then, how the fucking hell is that false ?

Also this nugget:

"The vaccine is delivered using a bubble of fat containing the virus's genetic material

...

Fat levels in the ovaries did increase in the 48 hours after the jab, as the vaccine contents moved from the injection site around the body. But, crucially, there was no evidence it still contained the virus's genetic material. "

Are you fucking for real ? After getting injected with vax fat bubbles, mysteriously the fat in the ovaries increases ? Did the new fat come from Jesus in Heaven ? What do you mean, there was no evidence it contained the genetic material ? You already said that at least 0.1% of the dose ended up in the ovaries !

Fucking unreal levels of gaslighting, from one sentence to the next

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
My favorite fake fact check was from USA Today: "Were more people killed in the 2021 riots than unarmed people were killed by police in 2020?"

According to the article, something like 31 unarmed people were killed by police in 2020, and at that point something like 35 people were killed in the riots. But they don't like that so MOSTLY FALSE.

source
realcaseyrollins ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
Haven't they always done this though?
- iamtanmay@wolfballs.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  Maybe I wasn't as red pilled and awake as I am post Trump/2016, but shit feels like next level, especially since the 2020 elections.
  
  Its like you suspect that a friend is trashing you behind your back vs them doing it openly to your face and telling you its actually tough love or some BS
  
  source
masterofballs@wolfballs.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
What I've read us that yes the injections increase risk but the virus increases the risk more. IMO you would be absolutely retarded to get vaccinated while pregnant with vaccines manufactured under Emergency use. My wife very successfully conceived and gave birth without being vaccinated. We took zero precautions. She never wore a mask unless like at the hospital visiting a DR where they made us.

source
- sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  I took the vaccine for work, but asked my pregnant wife not to. It's psychotic to test a vaccine like this on pregnant women. There's no ethical way to do that.
  
  source
- iamtanmay@wolfballs.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  At the place you read it, did they provide actual statistics ?
  
  Without accurate data, any journalist can say the risk is less. But is it 0.1% vs 0.01% or 0.1% vs 0.099% ? And since vaccinated are still 100% likely to get Covid, does it actually reduce the risk if you get vaccinated + covid ?
  
  There are no hard answers, just weasel words like "no scientific evidence to support claim" aka they know jack shit or "rare", which is a meaningless word - rare as in lightning strike level rare or rare like natural redheads ?
  
  And then, when people do post really bad numbers from public reporting like VAERS, they say its not reliable because its self reported, completely ignoring that 50% of reporting is by medical professionals, and that CDC requires side effect reporting to VAERS
  
  source
  - masterofballs@wolfballs.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
    TBH I'm sure big pharma paid for the study and then paid all the news stations to run the "results" I don't believe it was a real study.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments