“Social” isn’t part of the title. Meta is the company that acquired the site.
I also fail to see the ROI for buying a social media site for AI. There’s no advertising revenue to be made. At best you’re just charging a subscription fee.
Submitted 2 days ago by XLE@piefed.social to technology@beehaw.org
“Social” isn’t part of the title. Meta is the company that acquired the site.
I also fail to see the ROI for buying a social media site for AI. There’s no advertising revenue to be made. At best you’re just charging a subscription fee.
Often times these purchases are not for the product itself, but how it can be incorporated into an existing product. I imagine if Meta makes bot accounts for people to follow/engage with, they can increase user retention and therefore ad revenue.
they can make themselves appear loaded with customers when Infact, nobody uses their service… they stole your info, create accounts in your name, and post as of you are still using it… they are just lying to investors even more now.
advertising money is a way to funnel stolen money from company to company and bribe people. that’s it… advertising does not work, nor does it generate a good income for the shitty product that we all know is trash
Thanks, I don’t know how I copied that word and didn’t notice
I have no idea what function this purchase serves. Moltbook seems like Pogs with a shorter shelf life.
The creators received bunch of cash or maybe Meta stocks. Mission accomplished.
Tech business hasn’t been any tech for a while now. It’s about scamming investors.
artyom@piefed.social 2 days ago
LOL what’s the opposite of “Dead Internet Theory” 🤣
calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
That’s hilarious.
It’s telling that Meta is impressed by this kind of bullshit.
artyom@piefed.social 2 days ago
I don’t think they are, but it generated a bunch of hype, which is really all you need to impress investors.