No they’re not. All but one major network DRM’d the whole works in my area. They want to turn OTA TV into Cable/Streaming. FCC should force them to give up the public airwaves leased to them for doing that. Make them broadcast over the internet like every other DRM’d pay service.
How ATSC 3.0 aims to win over cord-cutters in 2026
Submitted 2 days ago by lostwonder@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://www.pcworld.com/article/3027740/how-atsc-3-0-aims-to-win-over-cord-cutters-in-2026.html
Comments
Banzai51@midwest.social 2 days ago
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
I lost all interest in it when stations started putting DRM in their over the air channels. It would have been a great upgrade if the FCC would have banned DRM and encryption.
adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Seems to me like Pirate Television should be really easy these days….
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 days ago
Honestly, operating a private streaming site is much ‘safer’ than pirate VHF/ UHF broadcasts, both in terms of what you’ll get charged with, and how long you’ll remain undetected. VHF and UHF broadcasts are literal homing beacons (and without something to bounce the signal off, very limited in what you’d reach).
Jellyfin on an offshore VPS, with invite-only accounts otoh…
Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Converter box? I literally checked the date on the article, I figured OP was confused.
Why would I pay money for something I don’t use anyway? Lol.
I feel they’ve vastly overestimated the market here.
tal@lemmy.today 2 days ago
dtvkit.org/atsc-3/
Sure wouldn’t want to miss out on that.