Realistic Scientific Method

Comments

• MalReynolds@piefed.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Damn I wish there was a line between ‘hypothesis unsupported’ and publish. Negative results are results too, and now someone else will try it and fail too. So much wasted time, but publishers…

  source
• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  This makes no sense. Where is all the masturbation?

  source

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    “Make a little love” it just happens to be self-love

    source
• KTJ_microbes@mander.xyz ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Hypothesis supported -> publish results -> do a little dance -> make a little love -> get down tonight

  That’s the most cryptic description of the peer review process I’ve ever read.

  Hypothesis seems supported -> Write a draft -> Get your hopes high -> Get fucked by reviewers discrediting your entire field -> Feel down after getting the paper out in 10th round of reviews in the the 5th journal you submitted to

  And that’s too much in brief, anyway

  source