Why I uninstalled ublock origin, this is WAY better!!

Comments

• cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Watched this and I agree with him. I’ve disabled (not uninstalled!) uBlock Origin and installed Ad Nauseum on both my home computers. At work I still use uBlock Origin since our data is limited (and we have a lot of computers online) so I try to work to reduce my bandwidth usage where I can. uBO helps with that. AN does not.

  At home though, I’m on gigabit cable and it’s only my wife and I, so no worries there.

  I like what he says about ad blockers just making advertisers shift tactics while spending some high amount on ads and getting a $0 ROI will make them think twice about how ads are done.

  I think, if you’re looking at the bigger picture, this more direct attack on ads will lead to more sites being paywalled. I’ve never seen paid search until 2025, and I’ve been online since 1994. AltaVista, Yahoo, and later Google were always free. But now you have search companies saying “pay us and we won’t track you, since we will be working for you.” I think in this day and age we’re already subscribing to so many things that the free options will continue to be good enough, but Proton has the right idea, bundling a lot of services people might want to use, like email and VPN and storage. They may not be the best at any of those things, but they are pretty good and they want you to be the customer rather than data brokers being the customer and you being the product, and I think that is admirable.

  source

  • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    pay us and we won’t track you, since we will be working for you.

    Do they stop tracking or for they just not show the ads?

    source
• witty_username@feddit.nl ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  it’s Adnauseam

  source

  • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is it better?

    source

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      gave it a test and to me it’s not worth it as its incompatible with some privacy safeguards librewolf implements

      source
    • witty_username@feddit.nl ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Not for just blocking adds. It messes up advertiser’s revenues. The idea is that it will disincentivise placing adds.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• my_hat_stinks@programming.dev ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s just adnauseum.

  That never made any sense to me. Sure, if you convert a significant amount of people to spamming ad clicks you reduce the value of each click but that just means advertisers will pay less per click. It also has zero effect if they user other metrics, if you pay on conversion rate (or number of signups/paying customers) a low follow through rate doesn’t matter.

  There is some value in messing with data by clicking everything but if you never see ads anyway that data isn’t worth a whole lot.

  source

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org ⁨36⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

    click everything

    It doesn’t click nearly everything by default, that would diminish uBlock’s bandwidth savings. I agree with your point though, and ads measuring signups rather than clicks have more agressive tracking by definition and should not be encouraged.

    source
  • theneverfox@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You’re also putting money in Google’s pocket… They’ve been caught doing things like this to cheese their metrics

    Once a customer burns through their ad buy and sees they got a ton of clicks, they’re going to think “oh shit, this worked great”. Even under closer inspection, it looks like the ad worked, but that they’re failing to make the sales

    So they’re probably going to buy more

    This idea only works by helping inflate the advertising bubble, until it pops you’re just supporting ad services

    source
• just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  TLDW: It’s Adnauseum

  source
• JohnnyCash@sopuli.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Sure better if you want everyone to know you’re clicking all the ads!

  source