Charlie was a hateful, bigoted piece of shit. You can’t rewrite history.
For those saying Charlie was hateful watch him debates a trans man
Submitted 3 days ago by Snatchdaddy@hilariouschaos.com to Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
Comments
Assassassin@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Snatchdaddy@hilariouschaos.com 2 days ago
Imagine having the balls to debate him on it
Assassassin@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You don’t need balls to debate a brick wall. He’s actually a more honest debater now than he was 2 days ago.
SlamWich@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’ll tell it to him when I piss on his grave
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 days ago
He also lashed out at the gay community, denouncing what he called the “LGBTQ agenda,” expressing opposition to same-sex marriage and suggesting that the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals, serves as “God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”
Hey, so what’s the counterpoint to “kill homosexuals”? How do I debate him on this?
Snatchdaddy@hilariouschaos.com 2 days ago
Debate him on it then, imagine like taking it out rather than putting a bullet in his head, I’m a conservative but I’m no Bible thumper, i believe in God though and get into it on religion at times with people
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 days ago
There’s no debating a threat to kill 10% of the population for simply existing.
You really think you’re cooking with the “put a bullet in his head” straw man when we don’t even have a conviction, never mind the killer’s manifesto.
And if the killer is a leftist (statistically unlikely) how does that relate to me? I don’t advocate killing anyone. Unlike your boy Charlie, who
iswas a stochastic terrorist.resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Hey “snatchdaddy” — guess what? The killer was a groyper.
Why won’t the right, you know, debate people with words instead of putting a bullet in the head of everyone they disagree with?
TheMoralNarcissit@hilariouschaos.com 1 day ago
I could get vid to work.
TheMoralNarcissit@hilariouschaos.com 23 hours ago
How do I edit this? I mean I was unable to play the moving picture show.
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023
Snatchdaddy@hilariouschaos.com 2 days ago
I agree with him on that however I would say that leaving schools in universities as soft targets is idiotic, with so many veterans in America why not just pay a couple veterans per school ,university etc. And give them like a spare room with a decent camera system and arm them to only respond to violent threats to the school. Just my suggestion.
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So you’re saying one death on Wednesday is a small price to pay for 2a?
hOrni@lemmy.world 3 days ago
His last words were “Counting or not counting gang violence?” when asked about mass shootings. He died as he lived, spewing bullshit.