Suella Braverman backs armed police after firearms officer charged with murder

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Syldon@feddit.uk⁩ to ⁨unitedkingdom@feddit.uk⁩

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/09/24/suella-braverman-armed-police-chris-kaba-murder-review/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr

This is so very wrong and will lead to a slippery slope similar to how the police operate in the US. You cannot allow police to work with a license to kill without any review process. Braverman is not the be all and end of the justice system. She should not be allowed to circumvent judicial process.

My opinion of those 70 officers is thankyou for being honest. You feel you cannot work with being subjected to reviews on such an important issue, then it is right you should not do so.

Credit to Phil Moorhouse as his was the original post I saw.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

rah@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

officers must not fear ‘ending up in the dock’

No. Officers must definitely fear ending up in the dock.

source
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Anything Cruella Braverman says can be discounted as viciousness signalling. She is essentially a wasp in humanoid form.

source
MDZA@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Braverman can do one. She and the Tories have shown nothing but utter contempt for the police ever since they’ve been in government.

Should there be a review of every fatal police incident? Absolutely. Do I trust Braverman to do right by the police or the public? Definitely not.

source
Chariotwheel@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Does Suella Braverman knows that the US exists? We can see there very, very often how it looks like when police has no accountability. It leads to a fat, corrupt police body and loss in trust into law enforcement and ultimately riots and discord among communities.

source
- Syldon@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The Tories have very close links with the Republicans in the US. They know exactly what they are doing.
  
  source