gotta blast!

Comments

• Cattail@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Don’t you have to conjugate the ket? Like I don’t think braket is dot multiplication

  source

  • cooligula@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can assume a and b are real to make the joke make sense.

    source

    • Eq0@literature.cafe ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You can extend the dot product to imaginary fields, there are a couple of standard extractions. If I remember correctly (but my quantum physics background is really poor, so I’m ready to be proven wrong) the one compatible with the bra-ket notation is

      a dot b := sum_i conj(a)_i b_i

      source
  • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The current administration has removed all genders from science, so quantum tense verb stems are now uninflected, sorry.

    source
• the_beber@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Oh the duality!

  source
• napkin2020@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  THIS SIMPLE TRICK RAISED $1M STARTUP MONRY (100% GUARANTEED)

  source

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Investor money embezzlement speedrun any%

    source
• Mgineer@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Took me too long to decipher the field

  source