Should I be worried about "Prompt ejection" attacks on my gmail?

Comments

• slazer2au@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Only if you are a llm pretending to be an A.I.

  source
• palebluethought@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I guess technically, but the LLM doesn’t have access to anything, so the only real consequence would be an inaccurate summary

  source
• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yes. Email has always been one of the more vulnerable parts of the computer ecosystem, because any stranger can use it to send a file into your computer or server for precessing.

  Simpler email is safer. Every new feature has bugs. Some bugs are vulnerabilities.

  Gmail adding leaning models is creating a new risk for you.

  How large that risk is, has yet to be discovered.

  My armchair opinion is that the new risk is minimal, compared to the rest of the risks is using email. But time will tell.

  source

  • vk6flab@lemmy.radio ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I work in ICT. Leaving Gmail is much easier said than done. It has the best spam filtering bar none and integrates with a whole host of other services that I use daily, like the mobile phone I’m writing this on for example, the one that integrates my calendar, tasks, contacts, photos, websites, YouTube channel, spreadsheets and, oh yeah … that other thing … Gmail.

    So, if wishing made it so.

    What I’d like is a Google Workspace tier that is entirely without AI.

    source

    • terrific@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Proton is pretty good and covers IMO the most critical parts of the Google ecosystem. I made the move a couple of weeks ago and it has been pretty easy, honestly.

      source
    • Stillwater@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I’ve left gmail and had no real challenges with spam filtering or anything else so far. I lost integration between calendar photos drive etc, which has removed some convenience, but that was also kind of the point.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yea. It is a difficult long process to DeGoogle.

      We even have a support group for it, here:

      lemmy.ml/c/degoogle

      We’re all at different stages, but swap tips and tricks.

      source
  • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    As far as prompt injection is concerned, I don’t think it’s a risk unless you’re using some kind of agent to go though emails, which is not a Gmail specific thing.

    If we’re taking about Google scraping your data the risk is more one of them having an incorrect profile on you, but running a conversational agent is quite expensive, I don’t they would have that as a large scale part of their pipeline. Embedding and clarification models likely aren’t instruction tuned so prompt injection won’t do anything.

    source

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Agreed. Architecturally, there’s no reason to have a prompt injection risk, of any kind, here.

      But, that was true about Log4J, as well - until we learned otherwise.

      I tend toward extra caution in this modern era of libraries stacked on libraries.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• nandeEbisu@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Only if you are piping those emails into something like an LLM assistant or search tool, especially if you’re not checking the results. And in that case, it doesn’t matter what email provider you use.

  I can see it maybe messing with search results when you look through your email, but again that’s independent of email provider.

  source
• Ragnor@feddit.dk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If I got a warning about prompt injections, I would check my browsers add-ons and remove anything that I didn’t absolutely trust. Your email likely contains a lot of personal info that can be used for identity theft and other related things.

  source
• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  so this is how i learn that gmail has AI shit integrated, lmao

  source